≡ Menu

War in Georgia

It appears that the Russians have advanced their attack beyong South Ossetia and are bombing Georgia proper.  It in media it sounds like the old Cold War again.  For instance, whoever is writing under the name fidel castro is supporting the Sovie- uh, Russians.

“It’s false that Georgia is defending its national sovereignty,” Castro said in the statement that appeared to reflect recent steps toward renewing Cuba-Russia relations.

“The request for a previous withdrawal of the invaders is just and our government supports it.”

As usual fidel can’t tell an invader from a defender.

Pravda sounds like Pravda of old, and, of course their attach on a democratic country is Bush’s fault.

In the meantime, Russian officials believe that it was the USA that orchestrated the current conflict. The chairman of the State Duma Committee for Security, Vladimir Vasilyev, believes that the current conflict is South Ossetia is very reminiscent to the wars in Iraq and Kosovo.

“The things that were happening in Kosovo, the things that were happening in Iraq – we are now following the same path. The further the situation unfolds, the more the world will understand that Georgia would never be able to do all this without America. South Ossetian defense officials used to make statements about imminent aggression from Georgia, but the latter denied everything, whereas the US Department of State released no comments on the matter. In essence, they have prepared the force, which destroys everything in South Ossetia, attacks civilians and hospitals. They are responsible for this. The world community will learn about it,” the official said.

The Wall Street Journal publishes today an urgent appeal from Georgia’s president:

As I write, Russia is waging war on my country.

On Friday, hundreds of Russian tanks crossed into Georgian territory, and Russian air force jets bombed Georgian airports, bases, ports and public markets. Many are dead, many more wounded. This invasion, which echoes Afghanistan in 1979 and the Prague Spring of 1968, threatens to undermine the stability of the international security system.

Why this war? This is the question my people are asking. This war is not of Georgia’s making, nor is it Georgia’s choice.

The Kremlin designed this war. Earlier this year, Russia tried to provoke Georgia by effectively annexing another of our separatist territories, Abkhazia. When we responded with restraint, Moscow brought the fight to South Ossetia.

What’s coming?  We’ll have to wait and see.

{ 0 comments }

Ecological terror – The Population Bomb

There’s a lot of talk about recreating 1968 this year as various groups try to reclaim their youth.  One of the disasters perpetrated on the world that year was Dr. Paul Ehrlich’s “The Population Bomb.”  On the front cover, highlighted in yellow, are the horrifying words:

“While you are reading these words four people will have died from starvation.  Most of them children.”

The premise of the book is that we faced a crisis of overpopulation, and that the world’s food producers would not be able to keep up. Millions of people would starve.  This book sold many copies during the late 60s and early 70s.  It was highly recommended in college ecology courses.  And it set the stage for today’s use of environmental hysteria as a basis to shut down the Western economy.

I have searched for an original copy of this book for years, and I finally found one published by Ballentine Books, Third Printing in August, 1968.   Why the need for an original, 1968, edition?  Because as the predictions made by Ehrlich failed to come about, they were conveniently edited out of the later editions.

This book is co-published by The Sierra Club, and it seriously calls into questions the orgainization’s motives and expertise.  Ehrlich is blurbed on the back cover:

Dr. Paul Ehrlich is Professior of Biology and Director of Graduate Study for the Department of Bilogical Sciences, Stanford University.  His specialty is population biology.  He has written over seventy scientific papers and several books on this an drelated subjects.

Sounds pretty good, huh?  In face, Ehrlich was a specialist in butterflies, not human populations.

Here’s another taste of the book, from the prologue

The battle to feed all of humanity is over.  In the 1970’s (sic) the world will undergo famines – hundreds of millions of people are going to starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked on now. At this late date, nothing can prevent a substantial increase in the world death rate, although many lives could be saved through dramatic programs to “stretch” the carrying capacity of the earth by increasing food production.  But these programs will only provide a stay of execution unless they are accompanied by determined and successful efforts at population control.  Population control is the conscious regulation of the numbers of human beings to meet the needs, not just of individual families, but of society as a whole.

There you have it.  Modern Environmentalism in a nutshell – we have sinned, the Wrath of Gaia is coming and there’s nothing we can do to stop it, but we should still turn an important aspect of our lives over to our betters for management.

And if you don’t remember the 70s, rest assured than none of these predictions ever ocurred.

We’ll have more excerpts from the book.

{ 1 comment }

The Obama age

Plus, twenty-five reasons you yourself may be a racistinflatable water park.

{ 5 comments }

It’s that time again

We’re not the only ones inflatable park tired of the election.

{ 4 comments }

Obama and the MSM

If you’re not reading Urgent Agenda every day, you should be.  Bill Katz brings interesting insight to political stories, such as his analysis of Dana Milbank’s piece in today’s Washington Post.

The juiciest of the juicy.  We don’t normally depend on the Washington Post to take a major swing at liberals, but the paper does have its glorious moments.  Today Dana Milbank breaks the silence and finally says what many of us have been thinking – that Barack Obama is a spoiled child with an out-of-control ego, and that even those who have jumped through burning hoops for him are getting disgusted.

While the media is obviously giving Obama a lot of coverage, I’ve wondered if we’d see a McCain rebound.  I spent more than a dozen years working in newsrooms around the country, and I saw how much reporters loved John McCain.  Love was their word.  I was rarely able to get a reason for this love, but the love was there.

Will Barack Obama make enough gaffes, or become arrogant enough, for the media to turn against him?  It seems to me that the past love for McCain may be enough to lure the media back. Despite Obama’s seeming sense of entitlement, I get the feeling this election is far from over.

{ 1 comment }