The posts claim that Obama showed a significant lead in the towns that hand counted ballots, vs. Hillary leading in the Diebold districts. The posters all admit that the Diebold machines are all in the more populated areas, while hand counting occurs in the lesser populated areas. It’s interesting that the assumption is automatically made that the machines themselves made the difference – not the difference in population that may show a difference in preference.
Also, ABC News says we must learn why the polls were so wrong. Here’s my suggestion – folks are tired of being bothered by pollsters and lie to them.
Update – Michelle Malkin has more.